Urban lifecycle management: A research program for smart government of smart cities
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7769/gesec.v7i2.531Palavras-chave:
Smart City, Urban Lifecycle Management, Smart Mobility, EcosystemResumo
At date, there is no standardized definition of what a smart city is, in spite many apply to propose a definition that fit with their offer, subsuming the whole of the city in one of its functions (smart grid, smart mobility…). Considering the smart cities as an ecosystem, that is to say a city that has systemic auto poeitic properties that are more than the sum of its parts, we develop an approach of modeling the smartness of the city. To understand how the city may behave as a sustainable ecosystem, we need a framework to design the interactions of the city subsystems. First we define a smart city as an ecosystem that is more than the sum of its parts, where sustainability is maintained through the interactions of urban functions. Second, we present a methodology to sustain the development over time of this ecosystem: Urban Lifecycle Management. Third, we define the tasks to be carried out by an integrator of the functions that constitute the smart city, we assume public administration has to play this role. Fourth, we present what should be a smart government for the smart city and the new capabilities to be developed.
Downloads
Referências
Alexander, C. (1977). A pattern language, town, buildings, constructions., Oxford University Press
Ashby W.R. (1962). Principles of the Self-organizing System, in: Principles of Self-Organization, von Foerster H. & Zopf G.(eds.),(Pergamon, Oxford), Cambridge, MA, 193-229.
Aydalot Ph (1986). Milieux Innovateurs en Europe, GREMI, Paris
Caron, F. (2012). La dynamique de l’innovation, Albin Michel, Paris
Chourabi, H., Nam, T., Walker, S., Gil-Garcia, J. R., Mellouli, S., Nahon, K., et al. (2012). Understanding Smart Cities: An Integrative Framework. The 45th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, pp. 2289 - 2297
Dedijer S. (1984). Au-delà de l’informatique, l’intelligence sociale, Stock, Paris
Dunleavy P., Margetts H., Bastow S. y Tinkler J. (2006), “New Public Management Is Dead: Long Live Digital-Era Governance”, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 16, pp. 467-494.
Godfrey P. (2012). Architecting Complex Systems in New Domains and Problems : Making Sense of Complexity and Managing the Unintended Consequences. in Complex System and Design Management, Proceedings.
Hardin, G. (1968), The Tragedy of the Commons. Science, New Series, vol. 162, n°3859, pp. 1243–1248.
Howard, E. (1902). Garden Cities of To-morrow. London, S. Sonnenschein & Co
Jacobs J. (1985). Cities and the Wealth of Nations. Random House, New-York.
Klijn E.H. (2005), “Designing and managing networks: possibilities and limitations for network management”, European Politicial Science, 4, pp. 328-339.
Krob D. (2009). Eléments d’architecture des systèmes complexes, in Gestion de la complexité et de l’information dans les grands systèmes critiques, A. Appriou, Ed., pp. 179-207.
Lazaroiu G.C y Roscia M. (2012). Definition methodology for the smart cities model. Energy, 47, pp. 326–332
Milward, H. y Provan K. (2000), “Governing the Hollow State”, Journal of Public Administration and Reserarch Theory, 10 (2), pp. 359-380.
Nijaki, L. K. y Worrel, G. (2012). Procurement for sustainable local economic development. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 25(2),pp. 133–153.
Neirotti P., De Marco A, Corinna Cagliano A, Mangano G, Scorrano F, (2014). Current trends in Smart City initiatives: Some stylised facts Cities, Volume 38. pp. 25-36
Ostrom E. (1991). Governing the Commons ; The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action, Cambridge University Press, NY.
Ostrom, E. (2010) .Beyond Markets and States: Polycentric Governance of Complex Economic Systems. American Economic Review, pp. 1-33.
Perez C. (2005), “Revoluciones tecnológicas y paradigmas tecno-económicos”,Tecnología y Construcción. Vol. 21, n.º 1, Caracas, abril.
Pollitt C. y Bouckaert G (2011, 3d expanded ed.),Public Management Reform, A Comparative Analysis - NPM, Governance and the Neo-Weberian State. Oxford University Press, Oxford, p. 367
Reinert S. (2011)., ed. Antonia Serra (2011).A Short Treatise on the Wealth and Poverty of Nations (1613). Anthem Press, London 2011.
Rochet C. (2008). Le bien commun comme main invisible : le legs de Machiavel à la gestion publique, Revue Internationale des Sciences Administratives, Vol. 74
Rochet C. (2011). Qu’est-ce qu’une bonne décision publique ? Editions universitaires européennes.
Rochet C. (2014). Les villes intelligentes, enjeux et stratégies pour de nouveaux marchés. Étude réalisée avec le concours de CERGAM, CESAMES, et du Service de coordination à l’intelligence économique (Ministère français des finances et des comptes publics).
Rochet C. et Pinot de Villechenon F. (2014). Urban Lifecycle Management: System Architecture Applied to the Conception and Monitoring of Smart Cities. Fifth International Conference on Complex Systems Design and Management, November 12-14.
Rochet C. et Volle M. (Eds.) (2015). L’intelligence iconomique, les nouveaux modèles d’affaire de la 3ème révolution industrielle. De Boeck Supérieur.
Schwartz H. (2010). States vs Markets : The Emergence of a Global Economy. Palgrave 3rd ed.
Simon H. A.(1969). The Sciences of the Artificial, MIT Press, 3rd ed.
Tainter J. (1990). The collapse of Complex Societies, Cambridge University Press.
Townsend (2013). Smart Cities: Big Data,Civic Hackers, and the Quest for a New Utopía, New York, Norton
TrussC. (2008) “Continuity and change: the role of the HR function in the modern public sector”,Public Administration, 86(4), pp.1071-1088
Von Hippel E. (1986). Lead Users: A Source of Novel Product Concepts, Management Science, 32(7), pp. 791–806,
Geofrey W., Luís M. A. Bettencourt, José Lobo, Dirk Helbing, Christian Kühnert (2007). Growth, innovation, scaling, and the pace of life in cities. Indiana University
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
• 1. The author(s) authorize the publication of the article in the journal.
• 2. The author(s) ensure that the contribution is original and unpublished and is not being evaluated in other journal(s).
• 3. The journal is not responsible for the opinions, ideas and concepts expressed in the texts because they are the sole responsibility of the author(s).
• 4. The publishers reserve the right to make adjustments and textual adaptation to the norms of APA.
• 5. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication, with the work [SPECIFY PERIOD OF TIME] after publication simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
• 6. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
• 7. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access) at http://opcit.eprints.org/oacitation-biblio.html
