Caracterización de spin-off universitarias de base tecnológica: el caso de una universidad pública en el estado de Guanajuato
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7769/gesec.v13i1.1246Palavras-chave:
Spin-off universitaria, Base tecnológica, Universidad.Resumo
Las innovaciones y el desarrollo tecnológico tienen un impacto local, económico y social importante, por lo que se vuelve relevante el fomento de procesos de I+D+i en las regiones. Las universidades constituyen uno de los centros encargados de generación de nuevos conocimientos que propician dichos procesos, esos nuevos conocimientos la llevan a buscar su aplicabilidad para la satisfacción de necesidades sociales. Uno de los mecanismos existentes para dicha aplicabilidad corresponde a spin-off universitarias de base tecnológica que representan nuevas empresas creadas a partir de la universidad resultado de conocimientos científicos y técnicos en ciencias e ingenierías. Es así como el objetivo de la presente investigación consiste en caracterizar a las spin-off universitarias de base tecnológica, de una universidad pública del estado de Guanajuato. El estudio corresponde a un estudio de caso, con un enfoque cualitativo empleando el diseño etnográfico; se realizaron un total de veinticuatro entrevistas a profundidad a spin-off universitarias de base tecnológica de una universidad pública del estado de Guanajuato, colaboradores de estas y a personal universitario de áreas de vinculación, extensión, proyectos y posgrados. Los resultados se agruparon en tres familias de códigos y veintidós categorías de análisis, destacándose que pueden surgir de manera planeada y no planeada. La institución de la que se desprende la spin-off es la universidad. Cuentan con figura jurídica propia, con una estructura financiera de asociados, joint venture o propia y el titular de la empresa es o fue el inventor/emprendedor y trabaja o trabajó en la universidad.
Downloads
Referências
Aceytuno, M. y Paz Báñez, M. (2008). La creación de spin-off universitarias: el caso de la Universidad de Huelva. URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10272/10810
Antonioli, D., Nicolli, F., Ramaciotti, L., y Rizzo, U. (2016). The effect of intrinsic and extrinsic motivations on academic’s entrepreneurial intention. Administrative Sciences, 6(4), 15. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci6040015.
Autio, E. (1994). New, technology-based firms as agents of RyD and innovation: an empirical study. Technovation, 14(4), 259-273. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0166-4972(94)90010-8
Battaglia, M., Sampling, N., y Lavrakas, P. (2008). Encyclopedia of survey research methods. Publication date. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781412963947.n337
Beraza, J. y Rodríguez, A. (2012). Tipología de las spin-offs en un contexto universitario: una propuesta de clasificación. URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10810/7939
Berbegal-Mirabent, J., Ribeiro-Soriano, D., y García, J. (2015). Can a magic recipe foster university spin-off creation? Journal of Business Research, 68(11), 2272-2278. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.06.010
Boh, W., De-Haan, U., Strom, R. (2016). University technology transfer through entrepreneurship: Faculty and students in spinoffs. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 41(4), 661–669. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-015-9399-6
Bueno, E. (2007). La Tercera Misión de la Universidad: El reto de la Transferencia del conocimiento. Revista madri+ d, (41), 2.
Buratti, N., Profumo, G., y Persico, L. (2020). The impact of market orientation on university spin-off business performance. Journal of International Entrepreneurship, 1-26. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10843-020-00282-4
Callan, B. (2001). Introduction: The new spin on spinoffs. STI Review, 26, 7-12.
Clark, B. (2004). Sustaining Change in Universities. Society for Research into Higher Education. Open University Press. Londres.
Clarysse, B., y Moray, N. (2004). A process study of entrepreneurial team formation: the case of a research-based spin-off. Journal of Business Venturing, 19(1), 55-79. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-9026(02)00113-1
Czarnitzki, D., Doherr, T., Hussinger, K., Schliessler, P., y Toole, A. A. (2016). Knowledge creates markets: The influence of entrepreneurial support and patent rights on academic entrepreneurship. European Economic Review, 86(SI), 131–146. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2016.04.010.
Djokovic, D., y Souitaris, V. (2008). Spinouts from academic institutions: a literature review with suggestions for further research. The journal of technology transfer, 33(3), 225-247. doi: 10.1007/s10961-006-9000-4
Económico, C. y Europeo, S. (2003). Libro verde: el espíritu empresarial en Europa. Bruselas, Comisión de las Comunidades Europeas, http://eurlex. europa. eu/LexUriServ/site/es/com/2003/com2003_0027es01. pdf.
Etzkowitz, H. (1998). The norms of entrepreneurial science: cognitive effects of the new university–industry linkages. Research Policy, 27, 823-833. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(98)00093-6
Etzkowitz, H. (2004). The evolution of the entrepreneurial university. International Journal of Technology and Globalisation, 1 (1). doi: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTG.2004.004551
Etzkowitz, H. y Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The dinamyc of innovation: from National Systems and “Mode 2” to a Triple Helix of university-industry-government relations, Research Policy, Vol. 9, pp. 109- 123.
Etzkowitz, H. y Leydesdorff, L. (eds) (1997). Universities and the global knowledge economy: a triple helix university – industry - government relation. Ed. Printer, Londres.
Fernández-Pérez, V., Alonso-Galicia, P., Rodríguez-Ariza, L., y Fuentes-Fuentes, M. (2015). Professional and personal social networks: A bridge to entrepreneurship for academics? European Management Journal,33(1), 37–47. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2014.07.003.
Ferrero, M., y Bessiere, V. (2016). From lab to venture: Cognitive factors influencing researchers’ decision to start a venture. Journal of Enterprising Culture, 24(2), 101–131. doi: https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218495816500059.
Fini, R., y Toschi, L. (2016). Academic logic and corporate entrepreneurial intentions: A study of the interaction between cognitive and institutional factors in new firms. International Small Business Journal, 34(5), 637–659. doi: http://doi.org/10.1177/0266242615575760
Geissler, M., Jahn, S. y Haefner, P. (2010). The entrepreneurial climate at universities: the impact of organizational factors. The theory and practice of entrepreneurship, 12-31.
Góngora, P. (2012). La formación bruta de capital fijo en México. 62(6).
Gubitta, P., Tognazzo, A., y Destro, F. (2016). Signaling in academic ventures: The role of technology transfer offices and university funds. Journal of Technology Transfer, 41(2), 368–393. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-015-9398-7.
Hernández-Sampieri, R., y Mendoza, C. (2018). Metodología de la investigación. Las rutas cuantitativa, cualitativa y mixta. México: Editorial McGraw Hill.
Hernández, R., Fernández, C. y Baptista, P. (2010). Metodología de la. Ciudad de México: Mc Graw Hill, 12, 20.
Iglesias, P. (2010). Las Spin-Off Universitarias como mecanismo de transferencia de tecnología y su impacto económico en base a la actividad de I+D+i. Málaga, España.
Iglesias, P., Jambrino, C., y Peñafiel, A. (2012). Caracterización de las Spin-Off universitarias como mecanismo de transferencia de tecnología a través de un análisis clúster. Revista Europea de Dirección y Economía de la empresa, 21(3), 240-254. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.redee.2012.05.004
Julien, P. A., y Molina, R. (2012). Una teoría sobre el emprendimiento regional en la economía del conocimiento: una metáfora de las novelas policiacas. Pearson.
Kaufmann, A., y Tödtling, F. (2001). Science–industry interaction in the process of innovation: the importance of boundary-crossing between systems. Research policy, 30(5), 791-804. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(00)00118-9
Lauto, G. y Compagno, C. (2009). Resources and motivational factors enabling the creation of academic spin-off. The Italian experience. In ESU Conference (pp. 1-12).
McQueen, D. y Wallmark, J. (1982). Spin-off companies from Chalmers University of Technology. Technovation, 1(4), 305-315. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0166-4972(82)90010-4
Merino, C. y Villar, L. (2007). Factores de éxito en los procesos de creación de empresas de base tecnológica. Economía industrial. URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10486/668659
Micheli, J. (2016). Desarrollo regional y terciarización: los casos de Guanajuato y Querétaro, México.
Moncada-Paternò-Castello, P., Tübke, A., Howells, J., Carbone, M., y NETWORK, E. (1999). The impact of corporate spin-offs on competitiveness and employment in the European union. Institute for Prospective Technological Studies.
Morales-Gualdrón, S., Gutiérrez-Gracia, A., y Dobón, S. (2009). The entrepreneurial motivation in academia: a multidimensional construct. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 5(3), 301-317.
Morales, S. (2010). El emprendedor académico: su perfil y motivaciones para convertirse en empresario. TEC empresarial, 4(2), 9-20.
Mustar, P., Wright, M. y Clarysse, B. (2008). University spin-off firms: lessons from ten years of experience in Europe. Science and Public Policy, 35(2), 67-80. doi: https://doi.org/10.3152/030234208X282862
Ndonzuau, F., Pirnay, F. y Surlemont, B. (2002). A stage model of academic spin-off creation. Technovation, 22(5), 281-289. doi: 10.1016/S0166-4972(01)00019-0
Nicolaou, N. y Birley, S. (2003). Academic networks in a trichotomous categorization of university spinouts. Journal of business venturing, 18(3), 333-359. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-9026(02)00118-0
Numprasertchai, S. e Igel, B. (2005). Managing Knowledge trough collaboration: multiple case studies of managing research in university laboratories in Thailand. Technovation, 25, 1173-1182. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2004.03.001
O’Shea, R., Chugh, H. y Allen, T. (2008). Determinants and consequences of university spinoff activity: a conceptual framework. J Technol Transfer 33, 653–666. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-007-9060-0
OECD (2001). Background report for the Workshop on Research-based spin-off. Group on Innovation and Technology Policy. Organization for Cooperation and Development, DTSI/STP/TIP (99)10, OECD. Paris.
Pirnay, F. (1998). Spin-off et essaimage: de quoi s' agit-il? Une revue de la littérature. In Compétitivité et identité des PME. URL: http://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetailyidt=6204817
Pirnay, F. y Surlemont, B. (2003). Toward a typology of university spin-offs. Small business economics, 21(4), 355-369. doi: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026167105153
Prabhu, G. (1999). Implementing university–industry joint product innovation projects. Technovation, 19(8), 495-505. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4972(98)00125-4
Prodan, I. y Drnovsek, M. (2010). Conceptualizing academic-entrepreneurial intentions: An empirical test. Technovation, 30(5-6), 332-347. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2010.02.002
Prokop, D., Huggins, R., y Bristow, G. (2019). The survival of academic spinoff companies: An empirical study of key determinants. International Small Business Journal, 37(5), 502-535. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0266242619833540
Radosevich, R. (1995). A model for entrepreneurial spin–offs from public technology sources. International journal of technology management, 10(7-8), 879-893. doi: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTM.1995.025664
Rappert, B., Webster, A., y Charles, D. (1999). Making sense of diversity and reluctance: academic–industrial relations and intellectual property. Research policy, 28(8), 873-890. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00028-1
Rasmussen, E., y Sørheim, R. (2012). How governments seek to bridge the financing gap for university spin-offs: Proof-of-concept, pre-seed, and seed funding. Technology Analysis y Strategic Management, 24(7), 663-678. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2012.705119
Roberts, E. y Malonet, D. (1996). Policies and structures for spinning off new companies from research and development organizations. R&d Management, 26(1), 17-48. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9310.1996.tb00927.x
Roberts, E. (1991). Entrepreneurs in high technology: Lessons from MIT and beyond. Oxford University Press.
Rodeiro, D., Calvo, N., y Fernández, S. (2012). La gestión empresarial como factor clave de desarrollo de las spin-offs universitarias. Análisis organizativo y financiero. URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10810/7940
Rogers, E. M., Takegami, S. y Yin, J. (2001). Lessons learned about technology transfer. Technovation, 21(4), 253-261. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4972(00)00039-0
Rogers, E., Hall, B., Hashimoto, Steffensen, M., Speakman, K. y Timko, M. (1999). Technology transfer from university-based research centers: The University of New Mexico experience. The Journal of Higher Education, 70(6), 687-705. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.1999.11780804
Rubio, A. (2009). Spin-off, la fuerza centrífuga de las ideas Centros europeos de empresas innovadoras (CEEI-Valencia). Recuperado de: http://www.ceei-valencia.com/index.php
Rubiralta, M. (2004). Transferencia a las empresas de la investigación universitaria: descripción de modelos europeos. Fundación Cotec para la Innovación Tecnológica.
Sáez, C. (2018). Ranking de universidades México 2018. MBA and Education. URL: https://mba.americaeconomia.com/articulos/notas/ranking-de-universidades-de-mexico-2018
Shane, S. (2004). Academic Entrepreneurship University spin offs and Wealth Creation. Londres: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Simón, E. (2003). La creación de empresas de base tecnológica: Una experiencia práctica. Proyecto para la promoción de empresas innovadoras de base tecnológica. España.
Smilor, R., Gibson, D. y Dietrich, G. (1990). University spin-out companies: technology start-ups from UT-Austin. Journal of business venturing, 5(1), 63-76. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0883-9026(90)90027-Q
Storey, D. y Tether, B. (1998). New technology-based firms in the European Union: an introduction. Research policy, 26(9), 933-946. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(97)00052-8
Universia (2014). Spin off: una nueva forma de emprender, una forma de investigar. URL: http://profesores.universia.es/investigacion/spin-off/spin-off-nueva-forma-emprender-forma- investigar.html.
Van Dierdonck, R., y Debackere, K. (1988). Academic entrepreneurship at Belgian universities. RyD Management, 18(4), 341-353. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9310.1988.tb00609.x
Vasilachis de Gialdino, I. (2006). La investigación cualitativa. Estrategias de investigación cualitativa, 23-64.
Vesperi, W., Fatta, D., y Parra, C. (2018). Providing a general framework about spin-off success factors in complex environments. International Journal of Markets and Business Systems, 3(2), 93-110. doi: 10.1504/IJMABS.2018.090494
Vohora, A., Wright, M., y Lockett, A. (2004). Critical junctures in the development of university high-tech spinout companies. Research policy, 33(1), 147-175. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(03)00107-0
Weitzman, E. y Miles, M. (1995). Computer programs for qualitative data analysis. Sage.
Wright, M., Hmieleski, K. M., Siegel, D. S., y Ensley, M. D. (2007). The role of human capital in technological entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 31(6), 791-806. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2007.00202.x
Yin, R. (1989). Case Study Research: Design and Methods, Applied social research Methods Series, Newbury Park CA, Sage.
Zomer, A., Jongbloed, B. y Enders, J. (2010). Do spin–offs make the academics head spin? The impacts of spin–off companies on their parent research organization. Minerva, 48 (3), pp 331-353. doi: 10.1007/s11024-010-9154-y
Zucker, L., Darby, M. y Amstrong, J. (1998). Geographically localized knowledge: spill overs or markets? Economic Inquiry, no 36 (1), pp. 65-86. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-7295.1998.tb01696.x
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
Copyright (c) 2022 María Catalina Rangel León
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
• 1. The author(s) authorize the publication of the article in the journal.
• 2. The author(s) ensure that the contribution is original and unpublished and is not being evaluated in other journal(s).
• 3. The journal is not responsible for the opinions, ideas and concepts expressed in the texts because they are the sole responsibility of the author(s).
• 4. The publishers reserve the right to make adjustments and textual adaptation to the norms of APA.
• 5. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication, with the work [SPECIFY PERIOD OF TIME] after publication simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
• 6. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
• 7. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access) at http://opcit.eprints.org/oacitation-biblio.html
